Thursday, November 09, 2017

Is Toronto's Condo Market Poised to Cool or Collapse?

November 9th 2017.

So today the CBC posted the following article on their website, but I don't want to talk about the article so much as I do want to talk about the implications of it:

Hundreds of Toronto condo buyers lose homes after developments fail

When Tanya Rumble and her partner Josh Kolic heard a new condo development was going up in their Junction neighbourhood, they thought it would be the ideal time and place to buy. After all, they had been renting in the neighbourhood for seven years and loved it.

The developer, Castlepoint Numa, advertised an exciting new 10-storey condo building on Sterling Road in the Junction Triangle, called Museum FLTS. The building was going to be close to transit, a new park, a daycare and a new contemporary art museum it was also building.

"We got really excited" Rumble explained. "I walked by the sales centre almost every day," she said, hoping to be one of the first people to put down a deposit the moment sales opened.

She was.

In May of 2016, Rumble and Kolic signed an agreement to purchase a two bedroom, two bath unit in the 10-storey condo. But as the months dragged on they noticed the project appeared stalled. "Sales staff kept telling us, 'Nothing to be feared. The developer has a great reputation,'" she said.

Unexpected letter came in the mail

Last week, about 18 months after signing their purchase agreement, the couple got a letter from Castlepoint Numa, along with more than 100 other condo buyers.

The company returned their deposits, explaining the condo project couldn't get construction financing. The developer also wrote, "we have not secured all of the development approvals or available permits" from the city of Toronto.

"We were pretty gutted," Rumble said. "It was quite devastating."

While the vast majority of condo projects proceed as planned in Toronto, CBC News has learned that more than a handful of proposed projects have failed this year alone, leaving hundreds if not thousands of buyers in limbo.

Many now find themselves priced out of Toronto's red-hot condo market where prices have soared 20 per cent in the last year alone, according to the Toronto Real Estate Board.

Developer says lack of financing, permits killed condo

Castlepoint Numa declined to answer several specific questions about the cancelled project, but in an email, company president Alfredo Romano vowed the condo will get built eventually.

It will "proceed but only once building permits are available. We can no longer rely on just a zoning bylaw to proceed to market. Only then will a project be 'safe' to go forward." he wrote.

Romano and company officials would not say when that would be, or whether they expect to resell the units to new buyers at higher prices.

The developer also declined to say whether it would offer the original buyers any discount or incentive once the project is eventually built.

Janice Creighton and her partner, Mike, also bought a condo at Museum FLTS and feels she's now been priced out of the market. "It seems as though there's a risk that you could put your money into something, think that you're in the market," she said, "and they could just take it away from you and resell it for whatever it is when they open it back up again."

Museum FLTS just the latest condo project to fail

Museum FLTS buyers aren't alone. Hundreds, if not thousands of other pre construction condo buyers have also been left in limbo.

Earlier this year, a project adjacent to the Mimico GO station in Etobicoke was placed into receivership after the developer, Stanton Renaissance, failed to meet its financial obligations. The company owed millions to suppliers and contractors.

More than 200 of the units in the proposed 27-storey tower had already been sold — some as far back as six years ago.

Today, the site remains only 15 per cent complete. It was recently sold to the Vandyk group of companies. Court records show Vandyk doesn't have to honour the purchase agreements of the original buyers, and it won't.

On the GO Mimico buyer Arash Borujerdi tells CBC News he still hasn't received his deposit back and fears he's now priced out of Toronto's housing market.

"The process has really set me back in life in terms of becoming a homeowner, as you know the prices have gone up substantially since I purchased," he said.

It doesn't take much for a condo to fail

Numerous other condo projects in the city have also failed — many due to lack of financing, zoning approvals or other factors. It's happened in Scarborough, North Toronto, and downtown. Hundreds of people who bought proposed condos and townhomes from Urbancorp are still fighting the bankrupt developer in court to recoup some of their losses. Unlike condos, deposits of freehold townhomes aren't protected.

Real estate lawyer Bob Aaron says it doesn't take much for a proposed condo to fail. A developer can simply decide they don't want the hassle of building if profits appear to be diminishing.

"It's always a case of buyer beware," he said.

"Sometimes purchasers think, 'I'm going to make so much money, I don't care about buyer beware, I'll take the risks.' Sometimes when the market gets a little tighter, people are a little more cautious."

Coun. Josh Matlow tabled a motion that was passed at city hall back in 2013, demanding Ontario's Ministry of Government and Consumer Affairs prevent developers from advertising or selling condos that still haven't obtained the necessary permits and approvals.

"Why should people believe all the community meetings, the votes at city council mean anything, if the developer is telling you there is already a predetermined outcome?" Matlow said.

"'Something is coming soon,' they advertise, even though nothing has been voted on."

Matlow says the province has yet to enact any regulations.

He also says a variety of issues can derail a proposed development, leaving behind financial and other problems for buyers who waited years for nothing.

As Creighton puts it, "I don't know that I could do pre-construction again knowing that this is the risk. I just kind of wish I had known beforehand that this was something that developers have done before."

Rumble says she and her partner knew buying a pre-construction condo came with risks but "developers are in a position to sell units when they don't have the necessary permits in hand. They can sell us a dream that they don't know if they can materialize."

So...

Really what happened is that the developer didn't have enough from people wanting to buy condo units. Lack of people and sales equals lack of financing. So when it came to crucial stages like getting permits to actually start construction, the developer decided to skip the whole project entirely.

Now this is just an example of one building, but I see it as evidence of something bigger. A cooling condo market.

And at present that is all it is, potentially.

As long as Toronto's economy remains strong, I don't currently expect any kind of collapse in condo prices.

To get that we would need Toronto to get hit by a recession, in which case the recession could be a tipping point if the economy sours enough to hurt condo sales - at which point then Toronto will be hit by condo and possibly housing market collapse.

But seeing as Toronto is not facing any kind of recession, and is not facing any recession in the foreseeable future, then a cooling of the condo market is all it could potentially be.

Sunday, October 01, 2017

Unveiling Non-Covered Perils in Home Insurance

Home insurance is a vital safeguard that provides homeowners with financial protection against various perils. However, it is crucial for homeowners to be aware of the perils that are not covered by standard home insurance policies. This article explores the issue of non-covered perils in home insurance, highlighting its importance and offering insights to help homeowners mitigate potential risks effectively.

Understanding Non-Covered Perils: 

Non-covered perils refer to events or circumstances that are excluded from standard home insurance policies. While policies differ, common examples of non-covered perils include floods, earthquakes, acts of war, nuclear accidents, and routine wear and tear.

The Importance of Non-Covered Perils:

  1. Risk Assessment and Planning: Recognizing non-covered perils is essential for homeowners to assess and plan for potential risks adequately. Understanding what perils are excluded allows homeowners to explore additional insurance options or risk management strategies to fill the gaps in coverage.

  2. Financial Preparedness: Non-covered perils can result in substantial financial losses if they occur. Being aware of these exclusions prompts homeowners to assess the potential financial impact and consider alternative means of protection to mitigate the risks effectively.

  3. Personalized Coverage: Understanding non-covered perils enables homeowners to customize their insurance coverage to meet their specific needs. By recognizing the risks associated with non-covered perils, homeowners can seek supplemental policies or endorsements that provide additional coverage for excluded events.

Mitigating Risks Associated with Non-Covered Perils:

  1. Evaluate Additional Coverage Options: Homeowners residing in areas prone to non-covered perils, such as flood-prone regions or earthquake-prone zones, should explore specialized insurance policies that specifically cover these perils. Purchasing separate flood insurance or earthquake insurance can offer the necessary financial protection against these events.

  2. Risk Mitigation Measures: Implementing preventive measures to reduce the likelihood or severity of non-covered perils can be beneficial. For example, homeowners in flood-prone areas can install flood-resistant measures such as flood barriers or elevated electrical systems. Earthquake-prone regions may require structural reinforcements to minimize damage.

  3. Emergency Preparedness: Developing a comprehensive emergency plan and assembling an emergency kit can help homeowners mitigate the effects of non-covered perils. This includes having evacuation routes, emergency contact information, and necessary supplies readily available in case of a disaster.

  4. Communication with Insurance Provider: Engaging in open communication with the insurance provider is crucial. Seek clarification regarding policy terms and exclusions. Additionally, notify the insurance company of any changes or upgrades to the property that may affect coverage or eligibility for supplemental policies.

  5. Stay Informed: Stay updated on local regulations, changes in insurance policies, and emerging risks that may impact coverage. Being informed allows homeowners to make informed decisions regarding additional coverage or risk management strategies.

  6. Seek Professional Advice: Consult with insurance professionals, such as agents or brokers, who specialize in home insurance. They can provide expert guidance tailored to specific needs and offer options to address non-covered perils.

Understanding non-covered perils in home insurance is of utmost importance for homeowners. By being aware of the risks excluded from standard policies, homeowners can evaluate their insurance coverage, assess potential financial risks, and take proactive measures to mitigate those risks effectively. Whether through obtaining additional coverage for specific perils, implementing risk mitigation measures, or staying informed about emerging risks, homeowners can ensure they have appropriate protection and peace of mind in the face of non-covered perils. By addressing this important issue, homeowners can strengthen their overall risk management strategy and safeguard their homes and finances effectively.

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

What is the best time of year in Toronto to move into a new home?

July 18th 2017.

So my wife and I were discussing recently possibly moving - mostly because we want to get away from an a$$hole neighbour who hears noises/talking when they aren't there and seems to think he can boss us around.

The problem however is that moving right now would be inconvenient, for a number of reasons.

#1. We have a newborn baby. And exhausted. Sleep is valuable to us.

#2. My wife is in law school and that keeps her very busy from September to May roughly.

#3. It is currently July, and July and August are the hottest / most humid months of the year.

I suppose we could hire movers to do all the work for us, however since neither of us are in the habit of hiring movers, doing it ourselves is our normal routine. Thus it makes sense just to wait.

After all movers don't unpack and organize everything once you are settled in to your new home.

Which got me thinking... What is the best time of year to move into a new home in Toronto?

Well, lets start with the following graph, which specifically shows temperatures for Toronto Island (which is slightly cooler than the rest of the city thanks to the Lake Cooling Effect).


In addition to your personal comfort, the temperature also plays a big role in trying to get friends to help you move. Your list of friends willing to show up and help you move will likely be cut short if it super hot or super cold outside.

The graph shows July and August are the hottest months of the year, so lets scratch those off the list right away as being "too hot" to do strenuous exercise like moving.

Another problem with July and August is that is the time of year college/university students move in, which means you might also be competing with them for rental space if you are in the apartment market.

The chart also shows that December, January, February and March are the coldest times of the year, with the average temperature (the black line) being below 0 most of that time. So lets remove them from the list as well.

Another problem with December is that many people are busy with Christmas / various holidays, and thus that makes a bad time of year to move regardless of temperature.

Imagine moving in on January 1st, New Years Day... Don't expect any help from friends with the moving process, they are probably all sleeping off a hangover, sleeping in, whatever.

What about Rain?

It might surprise you that in terms of volume it usually rains more in August than any other month of the year, but that volume is on average during 9 days of the month.

April and May however have on average 12 rainy days for each of those months.

Chance of Rain/Snow on the Day you move in...
  • January - 48% of Snow Day
  • February - 46% of Snowy Day
  • March - 42% of Snowy Day
  • April - 40% of Rainy Day
  • May - 39% of Rainy Day
  • June - 30% of Rainy Day
  • July - 29% of Rainy Day
  • August - 29% of Rainy Day
  • September - 33% of Rainy Day
  • October - 32% of Rainy Day
  • November - 42% of Rainy Day
  • December - 45% of Snowy Day

Thus June arguably ends up being the best time of year if you want to avoid the rain. August is good too, but way too hot. June is still pretty warm however so some people might want to avoid that month.

This makes you realize why so many people get married in June, because they want to avoid rain on their wedding day and have a stereotypical warm and sunny "June Wedding".

September and October are not bad either for rain, and the temperatures are certainly more comfortably average.

If you have children and they are in school, moving to a new school could make September a bad time to move - not so bad if your new home is still in the same neighbourhood and your kids will still be going to the same school.

November starts getting both colder and rainier, so lets knock that off the list right now.

My personal conclusion?

October is arguably the best time of year to move into a new home. September is 2nd best. June is 3rd best.

Other Factors

This varies for many people, but lets list a few other factors people might also have to worry about.
  • Work obligations keeping you busy.
  • Difficulty booking off vacation time to pack everything / move.
  • Family / friend obligations.
  • You already planned a vacation during that time period and don't want to cancel.
  •  Bad time of the year due to miscellaneous personal or financial reason.
Obviously hiring a mover speeds everything up, but not everyone trusts movers to:
  • Carry their valuables / breakables.
  • Not rip them off*.
* In recent years there have been horror stories of movers who held people's personal belongings hostage and demanded a higher amount of money - effectively extorting the client.

eg. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/man-charged-after-toronto-moving-company-allegedly-defrauded-extorted-customers-1.4139985 is just one news story about people getting ripped off by crooked moving companies.

Friday, April 21, 2017

Rent Control returns to Ontario

Ever since 1991 there has been a loophole that allowed the owners to set and change rents as they saw fit, which meant they could gouge renters for more money if they wanted to.

Rent control still applied to buildings that were built prior to 1991, guaranteeing that rentals could not be increased annually by any amount above and beyond the rate of inflation - and was capped at 2.5% even if the rate of inflation was more than that.

But new buildings that were built in 1991 or after, did not have rent control.

The loophole was created in 1991 in order to encourage property developers to build more rental units. Rent control was considered to be cost prohibitive, ie. not profitable enough. Building rental units made no sense to someone meaning to make a profit, as it would take significant time to finally get back their investment in building the property.

So to remedy the problem, the province got rid of rent control for all new buildings that were built after 1991.

Unfortunately the industry took advantage of the situation, built lots of condos instead, and then rented them out.

And then more recently, renters would see their monthly rent skyrocket to double to whatever they were paying before.

eg. Valerie Bruce, a renter living in Liberty Village, recently received a notice saying her rent would double from $1,600 to $3,200, so she decided to move.

And she was not alone. Many other Torontonians saw their rent double within the last year, as they are quite literally being squeezed out of the market.

Part of the current problem is that vacancies right now are really low. It is currently 1%, the lowest vacancy rate Toronto has seen in 7 years - not since 2010 has it been this low.

And when availability is low, prices tend to go up because the demand is high.

However doubling the rent on people who already are living in a particular place, well that is just ridiculous. It is that kind of flagrant disregard by landlords that has basically given them a bad rep and caused the provincial government to step in and put a stop to this nonsense - see the Ontario Fair Housing Plan below.

So it is the fault of landlords for getting greedy in the first place.

It is also the fault of real estate developers for taking advantage of the 1991 loophole to build condos between 1991 and 2017, when they were supposed to be building affordable apartment buildings. The purpose of that 1991 loophole was so they would build more affordable apartments, but they didn't build more apartments, they built condos instead - some of which ended up being used for high priced apartments by investors. There was nothing affordable about it at all.

The Ontario Fair Housing Plan
  • Expanding rent control to all units, including those built after 1991.
  • Annual rent increases for existing tenants can be no higher than the rate of inflation. 
  • Rent increases will be capped at 2.5 per cent, even if the rate of inflation is higher.
  • A standard lease will be developed in multiple languages.
  • Tenants will be adequately compensated if asked to vacate for "landlord use."
  • Change becomes effective as of April 20, regardless of when legislation is passed.
That last part means landlords will not be able to raise rent by more than 1.5 per cent this year — the annual provincial rent increase guideline for 2017, which was determined based on the inflation rate in 2016.

However, a landlord can raise rent by any amount in between tenant residencies. For example, if one tenant paying $1,600/month chooses to move out of their unit, the landlord can charge the incoming tenant $2,000/month or more.

It is also theoretically possible for renters to get in a bidding war if multiple people end up vying for the same unit at the same time.

Tuesday, March 14, 2017

London's Architectural Woes



Can too many skyscrapers make a city ugly?

Yes and no. Check out the video below wherein people in London England question the role of skyscrapers in British architecture.






Moffat Inspections provides thorough and reliable home inspections throughout Ajax, Pickering, and the Durham Region. The company focuses on uncovering potential issues before they become expensive problems, offering clear and practical reports that homeowners and buyers can actually understand. From foundations and roofs to plumbing, heating, and electrical systems, Moffat Inspections delivers detailed, honest assessments — no gimmicks, no guesswork. For professional property inspections done right, visit moffatinspections.ca.

Recently Popular Posts